Errant sovereign handbook

Always bear in mind that democracy and republicanism both share the same root concept. Alexander the Great, among many other innovations, was the first conqueror to use a money system as a passive control mechanism within newly occupied territories in lieu of garrisoning an occupation force which he did not have to spare. These are but a few of the things reviewed and discussed by the founders of our nation as they considered an optimum form of government.

Democracy was considered and flat. Look what it got Socrates in the end. The founders had to satisfy the popular expectations of self-governance in whatever form ofgovernment they might create for this country. There was simply too much popular and historical inertia to do it any other way.

It does not guarantee a "democratic" form of government. Even the so-called republicans are effusive about spreading "democracy" throughout the rest of the world. It's high time to bring' this demopublican political monster back under control before it destroys our nation and the rest of the world along with it. The prevailing "foreign. Hitler tried a similar "foreign policy" and look what it got him in the end The difference today is that there are now a variety of world destroying weapons at the disposal of too many would-be Napoleons in the world and in our own government!

The U. R tried a similar version of "Home Land Security". R is now history in less than a century of existence! Those who choose to. The following proposed legislative Bill is, among other things, intended to flush out and expose those who have infiltrated our government for the purpose of incrementally destroying it and enslaving us. These will either have to expose their true nature in opposing this Bill or go along with it.

If they go along with it, they will no longer be able to conduct their covert sabotage operations with the impunity they presently enjoy. Upon enactment of this Bill, a second Bill should be proposed which requires the legislature to review a specified number of existing statutes during each session for the purpose of confirming, modifying or repealing them on the basis of the test of sufficiency required by this' Sovereign Rights Protection Act.

This Bill is a mob rule "house cleaning" measure and in no way has any bearing on proper restoration and maintenance of individual sovereign status, standing or capacity.

The Bill will also keep the political parasites occupied while we attend to other, more pressing concerns. Since the government's legal machine BAR Association is the principal subversive "tool" being used, I expect it will be the BAR maggots and their lap-dogs mainstream media who scream the loudest when this Bill gets introduced.

There will likely be protests that this. The response to that rubbish should be that the legislative immunity clause does not supercede the individual accountability imposed by the mandatory Article VI Oath ofFidelity. It does not supercede the Impeachment clause. It does not supercede the Treason clause. Make it clear that if these political parasites do not police themselves:.

There's not enough time left to be overly polite about it. The individual and collective sovereign body has a constitutional duty to "instruct" the legislature from time to time. One does not have to be a registered voter to put proposed Bills before the state and federal legislatures. This proposed Bill can easily be regarded as direct "instruction" to the politician who is selected to be the delivery boy and indirect "instruction" to the rest of that crowd.

And if they fail to comply, the Declaration of Independence states, in no uncertain terms, that we have a Right and a Duty to resort to other more forceful means. Just put this proposed Bill in the hands of a legislator who professes to be a patriotic advocate and tell him or her, "I want you to introduce and strenuously advocate this proposed Bill in the legislature.

Ifslhe proves to be two-faced, you can always repeat the exercise with someone else while adding one name to the verified "enemy" list see Treason clause of the Constitution for the United States of America, AD The proposed Bill format is as follows:. This permanent expression of the will of the sovereign body of We the People clearly states that, "We hold these truths to be selfevident, that all men Said Organic Law then further states, "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

Therefore, it is clearly manifest upon the highest Lawful authority in this nation that the only legitimate purpose and function of government administration in this union of republics is the preservation and protection of certain God-given, individual unalienable Rights, a few of which have been enumerated and expressly declared as inviolate, with the remainder being expressly reserved. INTENT: The intent of this Bill is to insure legislative fulfilhnent of the above mandated function and purpose of government in this State and this union of States to the benefit of and in strict obedience to the expressed Will of the sovereign body and their posterity.

Any proposed Bill that fails to pass this test of sufficiency shall automatically be quashed without debate and without vote. In order to pass this test of sufficiency, each and every proposed Bill must contain the following: 1 A clear, concise and complete statement of every individual Right the proposed Bill is intended to preserve and protect as well as the specific manner in which such legislation is to obtain that object.

And if no individual Rights are so effected, it shall be so stated. And if no specific constitutional authority can be cited, then a statement shall be made that no constitutional authority prohibits such enactment and enforcement thereof. Witness my hand and seal:. The first is tacit procuration which, if properly constructed and skillfully. The second subject is how to properly cany a "common law lien" all the way through to forinal entry of lien judgment in the county lien judgment rolls.

This is. It's been done more than once. I am unaware of anyone, whom I have not personally trained in both of these subjects, who has successfully used either. The tacit procuration I'm referring to is very specific and narrow in it's application from. As I have previously mentioned, in order to act with Lawful authority, civil servants as. There is little doubt in most minds that these "Acts", which are in.

We can denounce and criticize these "Acts" to no end and it still does nothing to properly remove the assumed authority by which it was done. On that point, there has been only silence. In order to Lawfully void the acts ofan agent, attorney, representative or procurator, one. Remove the authority and the "Acts" are as void as if they never took place.

Unlike an express or written Consent, acts done under the authority of tacit procuration rely. And there's been plenty of that! Provided herein is a generic model of an affidavit that disavows. It is written. It supplements those sovereign status Whether or not you record the executed document is optional only so long as you have it witnessed by a State officer Notary Public so it might be placed under Apostille by the Secretary of State.

That will make it an "Act of State" which cannot be challenged in any government tribunal. Do the same with all equivalent State and County officers. It's going to be quite a mailing, so you might want to use Certificates of Mailing instead of Certified Mail to keep the costs down. It may also be used as evidence in an existing or pending court case.

Do not attempt to employ this affidavit unless you have restored and perfected your sovereign status and are comfortably confident in your ability to directly exercise the Powers and responsibilities that go with the status. It's entirely your choice to make. Market Street Mead, Wash. CF CF. That I am not a "U. That any act or attempted act by another or others which relies in whole or in part upon my sovereign authority for its Lawful validity, execution, or enforcement without my express Consent thereto shall constitute Trespass by Accroachment; and.

That I have not, do not, and will not ratify the application of any "public policy" to the individual or collective sovereign body of this State and this nation that is in any way and to any degree contrary to Fundamental American Law. John Howard Galt, sui juris. Witness my hand and official seal:. The foregoing affidavit should be kept in your sovereign evidence portfolio. There is another affidavit which is often needed to protect one's self and which should also be kept in your portfolio - to be used as needed in any active contest with the courts or other public offices.

This second affidavit was developed some years ago when I was tutoring an individual on the common law lien process which is why I mentioned the process at the beginning of this chapter. The connnon law lien process will be addressed in a subsequent handbook volume. The attorneys representing the "target" ofthe common law lien process tried every dirty, deceitful trick in the book to undermine the process.

They even tried to get a judge another BAR maggot to trespass on the Judgment. When that failed, it came to my attention that these BAR maggots were intending to have my pupil arrested and "criminally" charged with "simulating legal process" as a desperate means of coercing my pupil into undoing the lien. In their desperation, they became a living example of a pure oxymoron. This affidavit was dropped in the pot before they moved.

Their argument was thereby rendered a nullity before. This affidavit clearly states the Fundamental and superceding authority relied upon by the individual sovereign in the direct exercise of the powers of sovereignty. This is yet another perfect example of the dueling field principle in the "tar baby" mode. These two affidavits, used in tandem, will more effectively frustrate and intimidate any BAR maggot than any other device I have yet discovered.

Keep in mind that, while adaptable to other uses, this second affidavit was constructed and designed to support the legitimacy of a Lawful process.

More than any other single reason, what makes these affidavits so effective in their use is accurate, simple, straight-forward and self-explanatory language. Remember that when you write your own. Kis, F. I, John Howard Galt, the undersigned, do hereby Declare and solemnly Affirm, under the pains and penalties of Perjury of Fundamental American Law, the following to be the Truth, the whole Truth and nothing but the Truth: That I am a natural-born, flesh and blood man of substance upon the American terra firma within the surveyed geographical boundaries of the duly constituted State of Washington February 22, AD and in capita holder in due course thereof; and That I am one of the sovereign body of this State and of this nation through collateral consanguinity to the founders thereof and without political franchise by free will choice; and That I am a sovereign Elector of Lawful adult age, sound in both mind and body, and otherwise competent to make this affidavit; and That I am not a "U.

That sovereign authority vests in capita in me by Birthright without adulteration; and Page lof3. One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated. A chief ruler with supreme power. In the absence of valid controversy and upon my own authority, as one of the body sovereign of-this nation and of this State, I will engage the ministerial duties of any clerk of any court of proper jurisdiction and venue when and as necessary by due course of the Law of the Land.

Trespass on an uncontested case will not be tolerated. John Howard Galt. As I have previously mentioned and probably will again , the courts will not recognize any document with "common law" in its title or text. The phrase "by Operation of Law" means the same thing and will be recognized and handled by the courts as such. Today's postal service dates its origin to July 26, , when the Second Continental Congress agreed "that a Postmaster General be appointed for the United States" and named Benjamin Franklin to the position.

The Articles of Confederation gave Congress "the sole and exclusive right and power Following adoption of the Constitution, the Act of September 22, , temporarily established a post office and created the Office of the Postmaster General. The Act ofFebruary 20, same year as the Coinage Act , made detailed provisions for the Post Office, and subsequent legislation enlarged the duties of the Post Office, developed its organization, and issued rules and regulations regarding postal operations.

In , upon the invitation of President Andrew Jackson, the postmaster general became a member of the president's cabinet. In its earliest days, the Postal Service was referred to as the Post Office, then, nationally,. It should be noted that early postmasters general usually were public figures who would, for example, go on to serve as secretary of war, Supreme Court justice, orU.

Today, the postmaster general is usually selected from the ranks of top corporate executives who have proven skills and business acumen. Not surprising when one considers that over 80 per cent of today's postal traffic is business mail. The years following saw a gradual compounding of neglect as well as financial and administrative ineptitude.

By the mid's the Post Office Department was in deep trouble. In March a compromise measure was passed, resulting in a wide-spread mutiny of. Following negotiations, management and the unions agreed to jointly develop a reorganization plan, which was embodied in a legislative proposal sent to Congress by the president.

On that date, the postmaster general left the cabinet; the Postal Service received:. These members are five in number. Service in an eleven-member board of governors, nine"ofwhom are appointed by the president,.

All eleven members of the , I don't know about you, but I see a pattern of activity that spans decades. Congress has demonstrated a manifest penchant for fumbling the ball and "curing" it by Twenty years later, on July 1, Historically, postal rates have seen increases as a means of raising general revenue in times of war, beginning with the war of and continuing into the present. Somehow the "bill" for these wars never gets paid and increased postal rates never go back to their former level.

There is a direct correlation between postal rate increases in the past fifty years and this nation's escalating foreign military involvements. One must wonder if some the revenue bonds issued by the Postal Service corporation could in fact be regarded as "war bonds". A fairly typical example of the mechanism by which this is done is the P. Study this form in detail and read all the fine print on both sides of the card.

It says a great deal more than one might think it does. A copy of both sides of this form is provided on the following page for examination. Bear in mind that this is but one of many "official" forms. Ever wonder why such documents are called "fonns"? Only We the People individually or collectively have the Lawful authority. All that is required is an authorizing signature on a new "form" to change it.

Beginning to get the idea? StartDato: :. The persen signing this term states that he or sho III tho person, executor, guardian, authortzad officer, or agent of tho person for whom mall would be forwarded under this order. Collection Is authorized by 39 USC We do not dladese your Intormatlon, IIxcept In the following limited cIrcumstances: to gcvllmment agenclea or bodies..

Like most "ofiicial forms, nearly all the information on this card is divided into boxes. A "box", by definition, contains and separates certain things from other things, including mere space. An excellent analogy is that of a freight train. The P. Form plainly states what some of the "destinations" are; e. Note: in the case of"af', the actual prefix is "a". The extra ''t'' is added to conform the word to English grammar rules calling for the separation of vowels for pronunciation purposes.

Form , they tell you right up front there are "conditions" , In the signature. The rest of the statement, ''but we cannot forward your mail without it" is the inducement to contract. There is no mention made about delivery of your mail, which is a totally different issue ofLaw Some of the things your signature on this P.

Form card is authenticating or authorizing include:. Authorizes the USPS to act as a process server by mail. Authorizes extension of federal territorial jurisdiction beyond constitutional limits your address. Authorizes application of federal codes Titles 18, 26, 28, etc.

Authenticates that you are a federal 14th Amendment, name, corporate fiction "person". Authenticates your voluntary waiver of the entire Bill of Rights. Read the fine print on the card. It's all there. That's what your signature is in Fact. The same goes on with any other government, corporate or banking form that you sign. It's all free-wi. Ifthey had the authority to begin with, do you -nil.

Use your own "forms"! Praecipe or just a simple letter, which creates no contractUaTOS1ig'afionsonyouand authorizes. In either case, the notice should be sent to the The rest are mere "supervisors". Note: your notice and praecipe could, for example, explicitly state that it is not to be construed to authorize or authenticate any of the above listed items. It's your authority. Do what you will with it. A postal supervisor tried to bluff one of my readers in Spokane who had given notice by letter into filling out the P.

With a little help from me, the reader wrote back and said, "You were provided with more 'infonnation' than the P. Form calls for. Your insistence that I use and place my signature on your form indicates that you are not being entirely truthful with me. I am not in the habit of signing anything I do not author.

Although readers are encouraged to write their own documents to better conform to their individual circumstances, the following letter printed with permission can be used as a generic model to follow:. Greetings, You will please take notice that the undersigned is a natural-born anglo-saxon man whose political status is Sovereign American National and whose occupation requires a great deal of travel.

The undersigned has no fixed postal service street address and, for the express purpose of establishing a domicile of record where service of legal notices, lawful process and commercial presentments might be reliably delivered to the undersigned, you are hereby authorized and directed to forward for delivery any and all postage prepaid mail items received at your Post Office which are addressed' to Robert Vernon Montgomery, or any orthographic variation thereof, clo General Delivery, Pendleton, Oregon, United States of America to the above d.

You are further directed to notify all other necessary postal personnel, including the Postmaster at Spokane, Washington Metro Station , of this change in domicile address. The undersigned accepts full responsibility for notifying all other interested parties. This change in domicile address is permanent and takes effect sua sponte. Respectfu lIy,. It is an invitation to the dueling field. The last paragraph of Montgomery's letter explains the significance of that.

I am not entirely in agreement with his use of the term "military zones" in reference to Reconstruction Acts origins , but the difference of opinion is moot since "military zones" would fall well within the meaning of "federal enclave" and, in either case, it is not something the federal people would want brought to light in the courts.

For those who aren't quite so bold, but still want to disassociate themselves from the ZIP code without sacrificing efficiency of service, putting it in a box will contain and separate the ZIP code from the other address information without confusing the automated scanners, as do brackets, parenthesis, and such. Most of the older post offices are owned by and are built on ground that was in fact purchased by the federal government in accordance with Constitutional requirements and are in fact "federal enclaves" for which a ZIP code is entirely appropriate.

Like Washington, D. Form is filled out and signed. Thus, if one received mail through a box or even General Delivery at the main post office facility at Portland, Oregon, for example, the use of a ZIP code is appropriate. If you have already filled out and signed a P. Form for your present street address, it is difficult to advise you without another change of address how to undo that in light of the precept that we are presumed to know the Law as well as the extent of our sovereign status and authority.

A claim of mistake or error evidences incompetency as a sovereign , which only leaves a claim offraud difficult to prove. As always, you will have to determine what is best for you in the use of this information. If you're going to use them, use the international ones. The difference is well worth the extra When asked what country, just say Canada or Mexico makes no legal difference. Compare as follows:. Argument One could say that the highest and purest function of the judicial power in this country is to make and declare a perpetuating determination of truth on the basis of all available.

Evidence, by definition, displays itself. What one thinks or may "feel" about the evidence has no legitimate effect on the truth of what it actually is. One of the many ways our language expresses that sort of basic understanding is that a rose by any other name is still a rose. By that same standard, one could just as easily say that a maggot by any other name is still a maggot. However agreeable or disagreeable one may find the evidence of the truth, it does not alter the reality of that truth.

Argument, on the other hand, is, by definition, expressed disagreement with the truth of the evidence provided. Argument is a fonn of negotiation that is intended to compromise the evidence of the truth. Truth has nothing to gain through compromise, while argument has. The often stubborn insistence on the exercise of one's right to be heard is usually little more than a demand to argue.

The responsible sovereign commands a display of the evidence. That is the only reliable way in which actual truth might be discovered or "heard". Sometimes it is impractical to determine what something actually is. It then becomes necessary to establish what that something is not. That is referred to as "negative proof'.

In either event, it is the evidence which makes the truth apparent to any disinterested observer. Argument is superfluous in the presence of evidence, be it positive or negative in character. It has been justly said, more than once, that argument is for fools and attorneys. Justice, by definition, seeks perfection of evidence of truth and not the mere gratification of one's sense of right or wrong, or the vindication of one supposed moral code over another.

Not in any practical sense. For example; a "belief' is not considered as valid evidence of truth unless that supposed belief can be or has been. However, even the most skilled argument will not prevail over compelling evidence to the contrary. Likewise, hard evidence takes precedence over any and all unsubstantiated presumptions, assumptions, hypothications or fictions of law.

One should never, as a sovereign, engage in argument with one's civil servants, but rather insist on production and display of all available evidence.

This is especially true whenever there is a question of Lawful authority to act in a particular way challenge to jurisdiction. Naked affidavits unsupported by hard evidence are technically a form of argument. They are considered'prima facie "evidence" only so long as they remain unrebutted with hard When one is being accused of something, especially under the auspices of public authority, it is the accuser who carries the burden of providing hard evidence to substantiate his or her accusation s.

This is especially true when making a In this country, with its current "justice" system, that should be a.. The Full Disclosure Questionnaire hereinafter FDQ which follows is pretty much generic as to content and formatting, has been successfully used numerous times for traffic citation matters and is easily adapted for use in matters ofHabeas Corpus Cum Causa and Quo Warranto. Although it is adaptable to such use, the document is not intended as a "discovery" request.

It is intended to be used as a challenge to jurisdiction, requesting evidence of Lawful authority over one's person andlor property in a variety of applications. The example provided is modeled on a Washington seatbelt citation issued to a sovereign traveling companion not a paying "passenger'. Bear in mind that there was no other reason given as "probable cause" for the stop and the sovereign thus accosted said and did all the right things to criminally charge the "officer' with not less than four felonies and three misdemeanors.

The "officer's" own video recording provided the evidence and the citation issued provided the motive extortion. In guaranteed direct exercise of the powers of sovereignty, and by the authority of and in accordance with Section Four ''The constitution shall be republican in fonn," , Section Twelve " Lex succurrit ignoranti. Full Disclosure Questionnaire Section One: 1. The above referenced case is being brought against the accused as a: check one Criminal Action Civil Action Administrative Action Other Action: specify 2.

The nature of the process by which this action is brought against the accused is: check one Criminal Civil Other: specify 3. The constitutionaZly authorized jurisdiction under which the above referenced action is being brought against the accused is: check one Law "in pursuance of' the Constitution Equity Administrative "statutory'' Admiralty Quasi or Colorable Admiralty Military Other: specify 6.

The published Rules governing the type of action above indicated under the above indicated jurisdiction are entitled: specify and are available for public inspection at: specify 8. Breach of a voluntary consent agreement Other.

The name of the prosecuting witness claiming and possessing evidence of the actual damage or injury in support of this action is: specify.

The elements which, in the face of challenge, the Fundamental Law obligates your Office of public trust to prove in this action against the accused are: check those applicable. Jurisdiction over the subject matter.

Jurisdiction in personam over the accused. Proper venue territorial jurisdiction. The constitutional authority of the "law" alleged to have been violated by the accused. The actual harm, damage or injury being alleged as a violation of Law by the prosecuting witness.

Positive identification of the prosecuting witness, victim, injured party in Fact, real party in interest, or holder in due course who gave you or anyone else authority to bring this action against the accused in the name of public authority. Culpability intent of the accused.

Other: specify None of the above. This action is in Fact being brought against the accused in order to: check any that apply Redress actual injury to constitutionally secured private Rights. Arbitrarily compel specific perfonnance of purely political codes regardless ofindividuaI status and standing in Fact. Silence political dissidence.

Covertly wage mixed war upon the accused. Other: specify This action is being brought against the accused in a tribunal that is acting: check one Judicially Ministerially administratively Other: specify.

Bonded by the City of Spokane. Bonded by the County of Spokane. Bonded by the State of Washington Policy No. Section Two: A court of limited jurisdiction. A court of special or pro tempore jurisdiction. Not a judicial court of record Star Chamber. Not a judicial court.

The officers and staff of the Spokane County District Court receive compensation for their labor! The County of Spokane. The State of Washington. An office or agency of the United States. The officers and staff of the Spokane County District Court are: check one Liability bonded individually privately. Bonded by the State of Washington. Bonded by an office or agency of the United States. Otherwise bonded by:. You and your appointed deputies are: check one Liability bonded individually privately.

Otherwise bonded by: specify , under Policy No. Pushy, BadgeIID , to exercisejudicial power s in the performance of executive duties: check one. Yes: specify No Your office has in actual possession conclusive evidence that John Howard Galt is contractually obligated to perfonn or otherwise subject to the political codes of the "!

Disclosure Questionnaire Page 6. Your office has in actual possession conclusive evidence that one John Howard Galt is other than a natural-born, flesh and blood man, long since past the age of Consent: check one No Yes: specify Your office has in actual possession conclusive evidence that one John Howard Galt is other than a man of sound mind and body, in full possession of all his faculties: check one No Yes: specify Your office has in actual possession conclusive evidence that one John Howard Galt has, at any time, affinnatively and voluntarily surrendered, waived or in any way and to any degree impaired the exercise of any ofhis secured Rights, Privileges, Immunities and Remedies: check one No Yes: specify Your office has in actual possession conclusive evidence that one John Howard Galt is in Fact a ''trustee'' or "subrogee" or "surety" or any other similar cha.

Your office has in actual possession conclusive evidence that one John Howard Galt has in Fact surrendered, waived or otherwise impaired or forfeited his authority to make direct presentment in and to any public office or court of The State of Washington or The united States of America for any Lawful purpose whatsoever: check one No Yes: specify Full Disclosure Questionnaire.

It is a long and firmly established precept ofFlmdameotal American Law that an accused wo man is presumed innocent until proven guilty of any wrong doing. Your office has in actual possession conclusive evidence that John Howard Galt has in Fact surrendered, waived or otherwise forfeited or impaired his Right to enjoy the benefit of this presumption of Law: check one No Yes: specify It is a long and firmly established precept of Fundamental American Law that jurisdiction, in any of its elements, may be challenged at any time and, once challenged, it must be proven by he who bears the burden ofproot: as "mere assertion is not enough".

Your office bas in actual possession conclusive evidence that John Howard Galt bas in Fact surrendered, waived or otherwise forfeited or impaired his Right to enjoy the benefit of this precept of American Law: check one No Yes: specify Your office, as the moving party, carries the burden of proof in this action, including the proof of jurisdiction.

Your office has in actual possession conclusive evidence that John Howard Galt has waived or has otherwise relieved your office of that burden: check one No Yes: specify The disclosures provided herein above are hereby Certified, under the pains and penalties of Perjury of organic American Law, to be true, correct and complete. Witness my hand:. This Praecipe for immediate and full disclosure is mandatory and has been fonnatted as a multiple choice questionnaire as a time saving convenience to your office.

Failure to complete the foregoing Full Disclosure Questionnaire and return the same to the undersigned within ten 10 days of date of delivery may result in measures being taken to compel you to do so. Further obstruction may result in one or more criminal charges being brought against you in a Court of Justice.

By your Oath, you will be held accountable for all acts of commission or omission, as the case may be. In the alternative, you may file a formal notice of retraxit of suit into the above referenced case. These things you will faithfully do or come forth in writing and show good and Lawful cause why you couId not do that which is commanded herein.

All responses sent by U. A good s"''''' If the answer is "yes", the court loses jurisdiction. That is why judges. What you should notice is that the FDQ does.. The niain purpose of the FDQ is to draw in any other accessories, accomplices and conspirators, such as the prosecutor, the clerk, the judge, etc. With the right evidence, one can prevail in today's courts.

At the very least one would have enough evidence leverage to negotiate a settlement with Risk Management. If the settlement amount is reasonable, and if one has sufficient evidence to actually obtain criminal conviction s , Risk Management wiD "deal" with the offended sovereign.

They don't want the scandal of one or more of their people going to prison. Mostly they don't want the racketeering fraud exposed to the public. That would escalate the liability risk beyond acceptable levels. One flat refuses to deal with any other public officer" including judges, clerks and the like, -. It is necessary, however, to give notice to the And you have to make it clear that you will proceed no further with any other issue unill-".

In the foregoing example of a traffic citation case, a copy of the "-. This writ shall constitute fonnal response to alleged notice of infraction filed in your Office as Case No. I 2 14 You will please take notice ofand enter into said Case file the hereto annexed true copy of the Full Disclosure Questionnaire hand delivered to the Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney this same day; and You will please take further notice of and place a minute entry into said Case file that jurisdiction, as to proper venue, subject matter a.

Pushy, consisting of armed. Duly executed this twelfth day of the fifth month, anno domini two thousand and six, and of the independence of The united States of America, the two hundred twenty-ninth.

One can often combine the two into one document and adding rena. VeJified Complain, etc. The tt;. As to what that evidence should be and how to obtain it, I will detail elsewhere in this handbook. It is difficult for a sovereign wo man to act decisively and with confidence without the assurance of actual evidence in hand which proves who and what slhe is and is not. The FDQ is a "boilerplate" document and is purposefully structured to create a damned if they do and damned if they don't dilemma.

As is usually the case, the prosecutor failed he. He also did not file into the case a retraxit of suit. Instead as anticipated , the clerk tQok it upon himself to trespass the case by scheduling a "contested hearing", which made filing a "set-up" document necessary. It should be noted that the "contested hearing" was a routine ploy to trick one into.

Also to be noted is that there islwas no evidence by which to prove the "defendant" actually received notice of the said hearing.

It was discovered through other channels. And that is "hearsay" only. That implies rather plainly that there are electors who are not qualified. We know that to register to vote there are age, citizenship and residency restrictions. Is there anything else to be considered? Since the object of the limitation or reduction is the elector , we must then ask, what is being diminished or restricted?

What is the elector losing or giving up to obtain a qualified status? What does an elector still have that a qualified elector no longer has? To ascertain we will have to determine what an elector is, what an elector does or is capable of doing, and what an elector has or may have as a matter of course. As a verb, the root meaning of elector is to choose.

An elector is one who chooses or has the capacity to choose at will. In Law, that is a power and a right possessed by a sovereign. Related titles. Carousel Previous Carousel Next.

Techniques for Building a Good Administrative Record. Jump to Page. Search inside document. Jason Moore. Mathias Nagy. Iyah Mipanga. Lucy Maysonet. Maryam April. Jessica Abbot. Freeman Lawyer. Mark Ganir. Jason Henry. Andrew Bailey. Kurt Luna. Michael Kovach. Ebadur Rahman. Liz Zie. Angel Pagaran Amar. Leika Merced. Julie Hatcher-Julie Munoz Jackson. Popular in Culture.

Joe Doe. Laylee Taghizadeh. Emeka Nnaji. Borderline Personality Disorder a Practical Guide. Adrian Cano. Blue Eye's. Gayathri M. Arun Goutham. The Dispatch.